|
|
Rank: Supreme Overlord
Groups: Administration
, Member, Premium Member
Joined: 4/1/2007
Posts: 2,475
Location: Redmond, WA
|
Thanks to all the recent report posters this month - you're keeing me busy!
Please remember to use the rating system to reflect the fishing - not the quality of the trip. In other words, if you had no bites and still had a good time, rate it a "1", not a "3". Ignore the current comments that goes with a "1 thru 5". Just think of it as "1" for no fish, no bites, and "5" for hauling them in one after another, with the other numbers shades of those two extremes. We will be updating the rating definitions to indicate these changes with the next site update.
Our goal is to be able to incorporate the ratings into the data base so your help with this is critical and appreciated.
Thank you!
Editor, COO
"I like to turn it up to eleven. It's one louder. "
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Commander
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/29/2007
Posts: 576
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
Mike,
i think the way you worded the rating system make people rate their trip how they do, a person can have a 5 star day and catch no fish.
you know what i am saying?
"If people focused on the important things in life, there would be a shortage of fishing poles"
Max's Video Production
serving Washingtons greatest fishing website since 12/14/07
sending videos soon.
|
|
Rank: Captain
Groups: Beta Tester
, Member, Moderator, Premium Member
Joined: 5/23/2007
Posts: 695
Location: Shoreline, Wa
|
Thanks for the clarification Mike - I have always rated "the outing" and not "the catch". Now I will set the rating accordingly. Which will probably drastically bring down my rating average since most times I get more enjoyment out of fishing than I do actual fish! 
I fish not because I regard fishing as being terribly important, but because I suspect that so many of the other concerns of men are equally unimportant, and not nearly so much fun. ~ John Volker
|
|
Rank: Supreme Overlord
Groups: Administration
, Member, Premium Member
Joined: 4/1/2007
Posts: 2,475
Location: Redmond, WA
|
it's always been a tough call deciding which way to go on this. But I think it wll be more useful as a fish indicator which is what we are wanting it to become. Heck most days on the water are 3 or better for me for experiences, while most catching is less than a 3. 
Editor, COO"I like to turn it up to eleven. It's one louder. "
|
|
Rank: Commander
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/30/2007
Posts: 596
Location: seattle
|
very nice 
|
|
Rank: Admiral
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/29/2007
Posts: 1,749
Location: Sea Tac
|
Thanks for clarifying Mike. I know I am guilty of doing this.
|
|
Rank: Admiral
Groups: Member
, Premium Member
Joined: 5/11/2007
Posts: 679
Location: Poulsbo
|
Good! Hopefully everyone reads this post. Nothing like clicking on a 5 rating report and finding out that "it was a perfect day on the water but we didn't catch a thing." What's up with that?
Hope the upgraded rating system will be more streamline.
fishnislife
I am a BassaholicFish, Baits, Tournaments & BBQ's, Scenic Pictures, Hunting and World Record Pix: http://s27.photobucket.com/albums/c176/fishnislife/
|
|
Rank: Rear Admiral *
Groups: Beta Tester
, Member, Premium Member
Joined: 4/29/2007
Posts: 399
Location: Area 9
|
Good to now know....I'm definitely guilty of giving a 3 rating for a day I got skunked...
Will the current ratings for every report that have been submitted stay or will they get erased and start at scratch?
Don't chase reports...Be the report others chase....
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Guest
Joined: 3/31/2007
Posts: -9
|
The fishing is always fantastic - the catching is only an added bonus.
|
|
Rank: Supreme Overlord
Groups: Administration
, Member, Premium Member
Joined: 4/1/2007
Posts: 2,475
Location: Redmond, WA
|
unfortunately what's posted would be a pain to go back and fix - so the sooner this is fixed the better.
Editor, COO
"I like to turn it up to eleven. It's one louder. "
|
|
Rank: Commander
Groups: Member
, Premium Member
Joined: 4/1/2007
Posts: 308
Location: Port Orchard, WA
|
Maybe it should be called a "catching report" instead of a "fishing report." lol - just joking.
A nice bass is too valuable a resource to enjoy catching only once.
Fishing adds years to your life and life to your years - Homer Circle
|
|
Rank: Captain
Groups: Member
, Premium Member
Joined: 5/7/2007
Posts: 656
Location: cowiche
|
i have not been looking at the reports in some time just for the reason that i want to know were the "action" is. with taking trips getting more costly i've relied on those post's to give me an idea if it may be a 3-5, or a 1-2 on catching something in that particular water at a particular time of year. i would rate all my posts 5's if it was for a great day for fishing <')//<
|
|
Rank: Admiral
Groups: Member
, Premium Member
Joined: 5/11/2007
Posts: 679
Location: Poulsbo
|
It appears that the ratings have already started to improve.
Good idea posting this up and writing something about it on the home page.
fishnislife
I am a BassaholicFish, Baits, Tournaments & BBQ's, Scenic Pictures, Hunting and World Record Pix: http://s27.photobucket.com/albums/c176/fishnislife/
|
|
Rank: Commodore
Groups: Member
, Premium Member
Joined: 5/3/2007
Posts: 1,086
Location: Eastern Washington
|
Mike,
Does this mean I need to upgrade all future ratings on Rock Lake to a 5 and not downgrade to a 4 for the bad launch ramp? (JK)
Too much water, too many fish, too little time.
|
|
Rank: Supreme Overlord
Groups: Administration
, Member, Premium Member
Joined: 4/1/2007
Posts: 2,475
Location: Redmond, WA
|
yes. lousy ramps should not count against great fishing.
Editor, COO
"I like to turn it up to eleven. It's one louder. "
|
|
Rank: Commander
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/4/2007
Posts: 497
Location: Shoreline
|
Well, this is a little tricky when you apply it to tiger muskie fishing, because 1 tiger muskie boated for every 3 days of fishing is a good production rate, and fishless days are the norm in this sport. I'm kind of hesitant to rate a trip as a "1" because I didn't catch one on that trip. That's the nature of our sport.
|
|
Rank: Supreme Overlord
Groups: Administration
, Member, Premium Member
Joined: 4/1/2007
Posts: 2,475
Location: Redmond, WA
|
I think you have to use some judgement. We are trying to avoid the "didn't catch anything but it was a great day to be on the water so I give it a 5" ratings.
As to muskie - let's say you didn't catch any BUT you had several follows that got your heart racing. I'd call that a 3 for muskie fishing. I certainly wouldn't call it a 1.
Editor, COO
"I like to turn it up to eleven. It's one louder. "
|
|
Rank: Commander
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/5/2007
Posts: 385
Location: Yakima, Washington
|
I like the modifications to the rating system. A one star used to say, "you had a bad time and won't be back," something along those lines. I consider every fishing trip a "good time," regardless of catching anything or not. Catching fish is the icing on the cake, so to speak. I see that a one star now says "you didn't have any luck." This is much less ambiguous! Kudos.
Beerman
Remember two things, love Washington and leave only your footprints behind!
|
|
Rank: Commander
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/11/2008
Posts: 492
|
Funny cause Mike and myself were talking about what we would rate Rattlesnake when we fished it. I said oh probably a "4" and he agreed. He had caught around 8 and me around 6. That was certainly fun! I like the new rating system...it's solid. KTK
Get with the Fast Money Bros
|
|
|
Guest |